Dr. Robin Jensen and her employer, Vanderbilt University, have filed motions to dismiss the lawsuit brought against them by pseudoarchaeologist, professional filmmaker, and recent filer of multiple lawsuits against critics who disagree with his conclusions, Mr. Simcha Jacobovici.
These legal court filings are available to the public via the Washington DC court website, but as a public service to my readers, I’m making them available here for download as well:
- Dr. Robin Jensen’s Motion to Dismiss the civil case filed by Mr. Simcha Jacobovici
- Vanderbilt University’s Motion to Dismiss the civil case filed by Mr. Simcha Jacobovici
A quick perusal will demonstrate that there are multiple grounds on which the cases should be dismissed, including, but not limited to:
- The case is not in Washington DC’s jurisdiction.
- The allegation does not meet the threshold for the alleged “conspiracy” with an “unnamed, but not unknown” co-conspirator (who happens to be Joe Zias, whom Mr. Jacobovici is also suing).
- The statute of limitations had expired.
Any of the above three reasons are enough to dismiss (or at least transfer to a different jurisdiction) the conspiratorially-minded, frivolous lawsuit designed to intimidate scholars into not criticizing Jacobovici’s highly speculative films about archaeology.
(To his credit, his company’s non-archaeological documentaries are quite good, but his archaeology documentaries are roundly dismissed by scholars in the field, both in the US and Israel, with the exception of those scholars appearing in them or profiting somehow by working with Jacobovici on his archaeo-fantasies.)
Go and read the motions to dismiss Mr. Jacobovici’s most recent lawsuit against a scholar who once found herself working with him.
Filed under: archaeology, justice and legal, pseudoscience Tagged: | Associated Producers, court, joe zias, lawsuit, naked archaeologist, nina burleigh, pseudoarchaeology, Robin Jensen, simcha jacobovici, Vanderbilt