when making a claim, the fact that you are not a professional scholar does not exempt you from the responsibilities of sound reason, good judgment, requirements of evidence, peer-review, and cross-examination that make up the scholarly process.
robert r. cargill
Filed under: archaeology, education, religion, robert cargill, scholarship | Tagged: evidence, good judgment, peer-review, reason, responsibility, robert cargill, scholarly process |
You are only saying things like that because you are an axe-murderer.
amen.
I’d like to cite this but it’s not on Wikipedia…
[…] Robert Cargill at UCLA (See: thought for the day: on the scholarly process) […]
ummm, that was an “amen” to the original posting, not to the comment that you are an axe-murderer. Though I suppose the latter is possible as well…
so i married an axe murder is one of my favorite movies, so i took it as a compliment.