In honor of the nationwide premier of Darren Aronofsky’s new Noah movie, I’m reposting some pieces I’ve written in the past about the subject.
- “Forget about Noah’s Ark; There Was No Worldwide Flood” (Bible and Interpretation)
- the most clever argument thus far against a historical worldwide flood and noah’s ark (nonstampcollector web | YouTube)
(and check out nonstampcollector’s Noah website!)
- no, no you didn’t find noah’s ark (robertcargill.com)
I’ll actually be providing a review of the movie for ASOR sometime in the next few weeks.
For the time being, allow me a few introductory remarks about some of the reactions we’re beginning to see about the movie.
Religious conservatives always freak out whenever anyone messes with their ancient myths. Well, allow me to clarify: as long as you retell the myth as it is preserved in the Bible, you’re praised as a good and faithful servant and an excellent producer/director/actor.
But should you explain the origins of the myth, or offer your own mythological interpretation of the ancient biblical myth, or vary it in any way, well then you’re a heretic destined for burning flames of hell and the movie is immediately dismissed as the fanciful ravings of a godless atheist.
Remember, a worldwide flood has been disproved time and again. It’s a myth preserved in the Bible, which was based upon much earlier flood myths that were incorporated into the biblical narrative.
So why can’t a modern director offer his own interpretation of the ancient myth? When Baz Luhrmann reinterprets the Descent of Orpheus myth as “Moulin Rouge!“, or the Coen brothers reinterpret Homer’s Odyssey as “O Brother, Where Art Thou?“, everyone cheers (including conservative Christians). But when Darren Aronofsky retells the biblical flood myth as “Noah”, religious conservatives weep and gnash their teeth. And why are biblical myths so sacrosanct?
Because many religious fundamentalists still believe the account of the Flood in the Bible is historical. They believe it really happened, regardless of what science says. The myth is to be believed over science, but only when the myth is preserved in the Bible. If it’s a myth of another religious tradition, then it’s OK to accept science, and even to use science to disprove the myth. But if the myth is in the Bible, science suddenly sucks.
Look, they are myths. And this is modern motion picture art reinterpreting ancient literary art. So relax and enjoy the movie. And trust me, there will be plenty of scholars pointing out the places where the movie deviates from the biblical text and takes artistic liberties. Just please don’t confuse those of us who do this with the religious fundamentalists who criticize the movie because they believe the worldwide flood actually happened.
Filed under: ancient near east, archaeology, bible, christianity, judaism, pseudoscience, religion | Tagged: ark, asor, Baz Lurhmann, bible and interpretation, Bible Secrets Revealed, coen brothers, Darren Aronofsky, flood, Moulin Rouge, movie, noah, nonstampcollector, O Brother, Orpheus, russel crowe, The Bible, Where Art Thou? |